Personal tools
You are here: Home COP-12, Nairobi The Australian Emission Trading Experience
Document Actions

The Australian Emission Trading Experience

This presentation given by Julie- Anne Richards of the Climate Action Network Australia discusses The New South Whales’ Greenhouse Gas Abatement Scheme and the problems associated with its current form. CAN Australia wonders if this emissions trading is really effective at reducing greenhouse gas emissions or if it is just an elaborate and expensive way to disguise taking real action. CANA presents their position on what emissions trading should be, calls for more renewable energy in Australia and expresses their hope that Australia will ratify the Kyoto Protocol.

cana


Climate Action Network Australia (CANA) is a non-profit alliance of over 35 Australian organisations working to fight global warming.

Formed in 1998, CANA is the Australian branch of the global Climate Action Network, which has over 333 members in 88 nations.




Australia's Approach



Australia: Background

  • Highest emissions per capita
  • Federal Government = Coalition of Liberal and National (right wing)
      • NOT Party to Kyoto Protocol
      • Federal Government has said NO to emissions trading
  • Labor (left wing) hold all 7 state governments
      • NSW mandatory emissions trading since 1st Jan 2003
      • Coalition of state governments discussing implementing national emissions trading

  • “National” Electricity Market = East Coast market across states where electricity is traded.
  • In NSW most electricity provided by 3 government owned corporations – Energy Australia, Integral Energy and Country Energy.

NSW Greenhouse Gas Abatement Scheme

  • Commenced in current form on 1st January 2003
  • Requires NSW electricity retailers and other liable parties to meet mandatory targets for reducing greenhouse emissions resulting from the electricity they supply or use.
  • Or pay penalty of $10.50/tCO2e
  • NSW Greenhouse Gas Abatement Certificates (NGACs) created through certified generation demand side abatement and sequestration
  • Ambitious attempt to reduce emissions associated with electricity
        but ...
      • Complex design
      • Baseline and credit
      • Poor transparency
      • Estimated high transaction costs
      • Low additionality
  • The parameters of the scheme (cap) based on a business as usual calculation and on a per capita basis.  As the population of NSW grows, so too do emissions
  • Baseline and credit schemes always complex
      • Require an estimate of what would have happened
      • Credits are an estimate of emissions reductions – sometimes imperfect estimate
  • Very low transparency
      • Most information commercial in confidence
      • No requirement for participants to report publicly
      • Government (IPART) report on scheme had very little detail and no assessment of performance against the intent of scheme (reducing greenhouse gas emissions)
      • The remainder of this presentation is based on an independent search through the 2003 NGAC registry by NSW University's Centre for Energy and Environment Markets.
        • No rules on additionality
          • Against other government programs
          • Against business as usual
          • Conservative estimations suggest that 70% or more of all NGACs created may not be additional abatement.
Most of the information in this presentation sourced from University of NSW's Centre for Energy and Environment Markets (www.ceem.unsw.edu.au)


  • Australian Greenhouse Office estimate of NGAS Gross Abatement for 2010



Source:  AGO, 2004 from CEEM


  • Heavy market concentration


IPART = Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal

  • NSW Greenhouse Emissions


Source:  Australian Greenhouse Office


CAN Australia ET Position

    Emissions trading could be an efficient way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

    or

    it could be an elaborate and expensive way to disguise taking real action

  • Must be part of broad policy response
  • Must be cap and trade, with cap set to achieve deep cuts.
  • Permits auctioned, not allocated
  • Must be transparent

    Key test:  will our grandchildren thank us?

    (or will the scheme ensure an environmental outcome?)


Why Are Australia's Emissions High?




Second – we need renewables


pic1
  • Half of Australia's emissions come from producing electricity
    • 8% renewable, 77% coal

  • The EU uses 50% more renewables and energy efficiency and 50% more gas than Aust.







Third – we need to join the rest of the world